Talk:Classes: Difference between revisions
→The point of the C code?: Some RC-specific perspective
No edit summary |
(→The point of the C code?: Some RC-specific perspective) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 91:
::Notice how the problem of polymorphism of foo and bar now includes polymorphism of foo and bar's vtbls, and we have a meta recursion, goto 1, sanity lost. It's not pertinent to the code example or your comments, just some amusing observations. --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 00:34, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
:::As a general rule of thumb, if you ever find yourself implementing half of language B in language A, just go use language B. :) --[[User:Bnlott|Bnlott]] 01:10, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
::::Sure, given reasonable circumstantial constraints. However, just to drop a bit of RC-specific perspective, seeing how to implement language B in language A ''greatly'' makes understanding that half of language B ''much'' easier for someone more versed in language A. Comparing and demonstrating languages is only part of what RC does; demonstrating tasks through code is another major part. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 04:11, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
| |||