Talk:Assertions in design by contract: Difference between revisions
Talk:Assertions in design by contract (view source)
Revision as of 12:33, 1 October 2014
, 9 years agono edit summary
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 40:
##Tcl, via the XOTcl object-oriented extension
I have added an example of Ruby using [[https://github.com/egonSchiele/contracts.ruby contracts.ruby]]. Can we clarify which approach is required here.
:I hope we are going for DbyC. I shall look forward to the Racket solution "emphasizing that contract violations must blame the guilty party and must do so with an accurate explanation". Programmers will be taken out and shot!!!!--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 12:29, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
| |||