Talk:Arithmetic/Complex: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
m (moved Talk:Complex numbers to Talk:Arithmetic/Complex) |
Puppydrum64 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 14:
:::::As for operator overloading, perhaps you are confusing this with operator overloading for ''user defined'' types. This is trivially true for C because you cannot define functions that overload the symbolic infix operators (as opposed to the operator+() overloading in C++). However operator overloading for ''built-in'' types is well supported in C. C99 happens to add complex numbers as built-in types. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 11:10, 13 March 2008 (MDT)
:::::To avoid this kind of argument in the future, I am changing the task requirements to require printing the results. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 11:10, 13 March 2008 (MDT)
== Complex conjugate ==
''See [[Talk:Complex conjugate]].''
== ooRexx ==
say c1/c1 seems to be incorrect!?! --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 19:47, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
:Yea, I get 0.44+0.08i so flagged it as incorrect. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 20:30, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
::I've corrected the inv method which was incorrect --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 19:22, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
==Formulae made invisible by under-tested cosmetic edits at 01:25, 25 August 2016 ==
Under-tested cosmetic edits made to the task page at 01:25, 25 August 2016, including the injection of spaces around expressions in <math> tags, have left some or all of the task description formulae completely invisible to all browsers which display the graphic file version of formulae rather than processing the MathML (this is, in fact, the majority of browsers). The MediaWiki processor does not currently expect such spaces, and generates syntactically ill-formed HTML if they are introduced. Other aspects of these cosmetic edits may further compound the problem. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:36, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
: Now repaired [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 13:08, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
==Assembly==
Is it cheating if I consider <math>i^2</math> to be 255 since that's negative 1 on an 8 bit computer? --[[User:Puppydrum64|Puppydrum64]] ([[User talk:Puppydrum64|talk]]) 20:39, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
| |||