Anonymous user
Talk:Arbitrary-precision integers (included): Difference between revisions
Talk:Arbitrary-precision integers (included) (view source)
Revision as of 18:10, 2 June 2021
, 2 years ago→failure of ooRexx using Classic REXX example: fixed an HTML tag.
m (→failure of ooRexx using Classic REXX example: fixed an HTML tag.) |
|||
Line 154:
: Yes, Regina and R4 are both very lenient (liberal?) in their usage of exponents. But increasing the numeric digits just bypasses the problem, it doesn't fix it in that it is apparently one more difference between ooRexx and Classic REXXes.
: Also, the (internal) subroutines of these REXXes may use a '''numeric digits 9''', there bypassing the use/limit '''numeric digits 5''' (as in the older/replaced 2<sup>nd</sup> version). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 18:31, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
|