Talk:4-rings or 4-squares puzzle: Difference between revisions

Talk:4-rings or 4-squares puzzle (view source)

885 bytes added , 6 years ago

m

6,951

edits

Revision as of 18:28, 25 January 2017 (view source) Nigel Galloway (talk \| contribs) (→‎Why nearly all write "non-unique solutions" ?) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 13:47, 10 June 2017 (view source) Rdm (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Some missing solutions)
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 50: So maximum of 336 combinations (764*2) to test, rather than 5040 permutations of all 7. </pre> ~~--~~~~~~ --[[User:Nigel Galloway\|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway\|talk]]) 18:29, 25 January 2017 (UTC) == <del>Some missing solutions</del> == <del>It looks like some of the current implementations are missing some of the puzzle solutions.</del> --[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm\|talk]]) 12:55, 10 June 2017 (UTC) 4 5 3 1 6 2 7 7 2 6 1 3 5 4 3 7 2 1 5 4 6 6 4 1 5 2 3 7 6 4 5 1 2 7 3 7 3 2 5 1 4 6 3 8 1 2 4 5 6 <- 3 8 1 2 5 4 7 <- 3 8 2 1 4 6 5 <- 3 8 2 1 6 4 7 <- 4 7 1 3 2 6 5 5 6 2 3 1 7 4 :Re the J solution (reproduced above) Ummm. I think you have a bug in your list generation. Where does 8 fall in 1 through 7? --[[User:Thundergnat\|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat\|talk]]) 13:34, 10 June 2017 (UTC) ::Ah, good point. Careless of me. Thanks. --[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm\|talk]]) 13:46, 10 June 2017 (UTC)