Talk:15 puzzle solver: Difference between revisions
→Code obfuscation / reference to implemented algorithm
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1:
== Code obfuscation / reference to implemented algorithm ==
As of today, 6 out of 14 implementations are translations of a same piece of code that is intentionally obfuscated and comes without any descriptions/explanations. It would be nice to see any proofs the implemented algorithm is correct (that is, detects an optimal solution).
Also submitting an obfuscated code clearly contradicts the very idea of the site as a Programming Chrestomathy.
:Maybe this will help: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfsYSPCNWCw - SCNR, the more I watched the funnier I found it. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 15:09, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
== Mathematical meaning of minimum ==
The meaning of minimum has been discussed see: [http://www.rosettacode.org/wiki/Talk:Superpermutation_minimisation#Ambiguous Minimum]. It means 52 not 58, assuming fewest is a synonym for minimum. I think the task description should call for 'minimum solutions to random 15 puzzles' (see below)--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 10:28, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
| |||