Anonymous user
Talk:Arbitrary-precision integers (included): Difference between revisions
Talk:Arbitrary-precision integers (included) (view source)
Revision as of 05:15, 16 May 2011
, 13 years ago→Missing output: Is missing.
(→Missing output: proof is in the execution) |
(→Missing output: Is missing.) |
||
Line 91:
: Seems fair to me. To be exact, so long as the right output is produced, it's not required here. Especially if there is model output that can be pointed at. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 00:03, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
: Unfotunately, that interpretation is wrong. The only reason for:
:# Duplication/emphasis of print-like keywords e.g. "print and show" or "generate and show" in this case it is "find and show".
:# Attaching an <nowiki>{{output?|language|reason>}}</nowiki> box on examples that don't.
:# Having the task author repeatedly state in the task talk page that output should appear.
:# Having edits summaries for revisions mentioning the lack of output.
:# The majority of other examples having output shown.
: ... Is to guide fellow contributors to the conclusion that the giving of output is a necessary part of the task description.
: Note also that in case of personal doubt, you are less likely to need to revise your submission if you include the output. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 05:15, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
| |||