Simulated optics experiment/Simulator: Difference between revisions

m
(→‎Extra "credit": Some explanation of the purpose of the simulation.)
Line 57:
Though the simulation now includes "photons" instead of classical optics, it will be perfectly valid for the data analyzer to take into account which direction of travel got which photon. This is because these are not "photons" as physicists usually assume them to be, but ''photons-containing-hidden-variables''. The analysis therefore ''must'' take into account which photon is which.
 
All but a few physicists either claim photons-containing-hidden-variables cannot possibly explain actual experimental results, or take the word of other physicists for this. There supposedly is a "mathematical" proof of thisit. Our simulation should end up contradicting that claim, indicating that the "mathematics" ''must be'' incorrect in some fashion. How to interpret that result that I leave to the individual.
 
(It is not necessary to have an experimentally proven model of photons-containing-hidden-variables, for the simulation to achieve its goal. In the realm of ''mathematics'', even a facetious counterexample is absolute disproof of a "theorem".)
1,448

edits