Anonymous user
Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Grouping tasks: Difference between revisions
Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Grouping tasks (view source)
Revision as of 22:50, 18 May 2011
, 12 years agomore on phantoms
No edit summary |
(more on phantoms) |
||
Line 14:
:Yeah I had tried to organize the tasks long ago, but it didn't work as well as I had hoped. It would be a little easier to understand with the category tree extension, but it still wouldn't be that good. The argument for the task template is for a category to put it in. I say go ahead and make the category. I think people use [[:Category:Programming Tasks]] in general anyway, so it won't confuse people. If you can think of any more groups go ahead and suggest them here. Maybe we can give the organization another shot. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 17:54, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
:BTW. I like the classifications of function-functions above. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 22:50, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
:I did a quick analysis of classifications on RC [[Icon%2BUnicon/Analysis_of_UnimplementedTasks#Analysis_of_Programming_Categories_on_Rosetta|Analysis of Rosetta Programming Categories]] as part trying to understand how the classifications evolved (for another purpose). This may be of use. Feel free to copy it for this purpose.
Line 32 ⟶ 34:
: --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 11:45, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
::Go to the template page and click on the "what links here" link on the bottom left. That will show you all the pages that use a template (as well as ones that link to it directly). --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 12:25, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
::A comment on one of the pages in question suggested the library may be correct and that disambiguation may be need like Library: prime (language). I'm not convinced if there is a library or package called primes that it would not have a broader name like the well known hosting site or such. The RC template [[:Template:Library]] has no documentation about what is expected/required so there is little surprise that people use the template differently. At least one attempt to get more information was made in 2009 but it didn't seem to go anywhere. Even if we conclude that a certain use is wrong, we'd need to go around an mark the pages needs improvement or similar. Examples:
::: <nowiki>Using {{libheader|Primes}} from [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/hackage.html HackageDB]</nowiki> - creates Primes and formats in an ugly fashion
::: <nowkii>{{libheader|Icon Programming Library}}
[http://www.cs.arizona.edu/icon/library/src/procs/strings.icn strings.icn provides deletec and sortc]</wiki>
::: vs. something else. What is intended?
:: --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 22:50, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
| |||