Implicit type conversion: Difference between revisions

m
added whitespace before the TOC, added a Task (bold) header.
m (added whitespace before the TOC (table of contents).)
m (added whitespace before the TOC, added a Task (bold) header.)
Line 6:
The alternative would be to ''explicitly'' convert a value from one type to another, using a ''function'' or some other mechanism (e.g. an explicit cast).
 
 
The following code samples demonstrate the various type conversions in each language, and give an example of a ''implicit type conversion'' path from the smallest possible variable size to the largest possible variable size. (Where the size of the underlying variable's data strictly increases).
;Task:
The following code samples demonstrateDemonstrate the various type conversions in each language, and give an example of a ''implicit type conversion'' path from the smallest possible variable size to the largest possible variable size. (Where the size of the underlying variable's data strictly increases).
 
In strong typed languages ''some'' types are actually mutually incompatible. In this case the language may have disjoint type conversion paths, or even branching type conversion paths. (Where it occurs in a specific language, it is demonstrated in the code samples below.)
Line 12 ⟶ 14:
Languages that don't support ''any'' ''implicit type conversion'' are detailed in the [[:Category:Maintenance/OmitCategoriesCreated|/Omit]] categories at the bottom of this page.
 
Indicate if the language supports ''user defined'' type conversion definitions. And give an example of such a definition. (E.g. define an ''implicit type conversion'' from '''real''' to '''complex''' numbers, or from '''char''' to an array of '''char''' of length 1.)
 
And give an example of such a definition.   (E.g. define an ''implicit type conversion'' from '''real''' to '''complex''' numbers, or from '''char''' to an array of '''char''' of length 1.)
<br><br>