Anonymous user
Category talk:Standard ML: Difference between revisions
What to do with ML?
(Migrated discussion with response) |
(What to do with ML?) |
||
Line 5:
::Standard ML has basically the same typing system as [[OCaml]], which is pretty much the same as in [[Haskell]]. So I would expect all those languages to be listed under the same categories for typing system. --[[User:Spoon!|Spoon!]] 18:33, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
:::You know better than I do. Go ahead and change it. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 18:36, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Lately I've been adding [[mLite]] entries. I've been putting them together with [[Standard ML]] under the one category of [[ML]]. At this point there's nothing in the system backing up the use of [[ML]]. Should I continue to merge them? [[mLite]] and [[Standard ML]] are quite similar but do differ markedly from time to time. Should other ML-ish languages get sucked in as well, e.g. [[Caml]] and [[OCaml]], or are they sufficiently different to warrant separate treatment? [[User:Axtens|Axtens]] ([[User talk:Axtens|talk]]) 07:37, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
| |||