Anonymous user
Category talk:Brainf***: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(The bounder called me religious!) |
No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 10:
: Principle is lost. We're censoring the name of a programming language for the sake of any religious people who happen to peruse the page. If users here are anything like me and my university classmates, the censoring itself is far more offensive than the actual word being censored. --[[Special:Contributions/83.250.91.162|83.250.91.162]] 09:39, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
:: Religious? Where? Its sad when the mere mention of the word 'polite' causes such reactions. Can there really be any doubt as to the name of the language? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 13:08, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
:: I'm not (very) principled. I'm a pragmatic and have little enough time to devote to site maintenance as things stand already. I already had to poke one school about unblocking Rosetta Code because of a string that appeared in our ReCAPTCHA key. I ''know'' those same proxy filters will block anything related to this language, and I don't have time to argue with numerous unlisted campus IT department (who needs a well-organized campus directory?) so their CS and programming students can create accounts. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 14:16, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
::: So the only way that some university classmates can see the page to complain of its censorship is if one shows restraint. Methinks ther's a greater battle for students to enjoin. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 16:49, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
How about Pa**al, FOR****, **BOL? These names are quite offensive too! (Posted by [[User:178.140.240.108]] at 23:43, 8 January 2012 UTC )
: Do you really think I ''like'' censorship? Those languages don't get blocked by censoring proxy filters. Also, I've blocked you for one day; you may still create an account. Furthermore, please sign your "Talk" namespace posts with <nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki> --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 15:01, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
:: > Do you really think I ''like'' censorship? ...
:: > ... Also, I've blocked you for one day;
:: Answer becomes quite obvious, certainly, you do :-)
:: > you may still create an account
:: What makes you think i'm craving for the membership of the community which leader and sysop feels a butthurt from slightest critics and is so ingenious to resolve technical problems with ultimate panacea - censorsh*t?
::: Anonymous coward further "censored" for irony. --[[User:Ttmrichter|Michael T. Richter]] ([[User talk:Ttmrichter|talk]]) 00:38, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Someday the people who think words like the one being "censored" in the title are "edgy" or somehow emblematic of an important philosophy will pass through puberty and into the realm of adulthood. --[[User:Ttmrichter|Michael T. Richter]] ([[User talk:Ttmrichter|talk]]) 00:38, 14 January 2014 (UTC) (who swears like a sailor '''when appropriate to circumstance''')
| |||