Category:Red: Difference between revisions

Category:Red (view source)

Revision as of 21:15, 13 February 2023

76 bytes added , 1 year ago

no edit summary

Haizetan

11

edits

Revision as of 08:42, 7 October 2016 (view source) rosettacode>Dockimbel (Initialize page)		Revision as of 21:15, 13 February 2023 (view source) Haizetan (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: ~~{{stub}}~~{{language\|Red}} \|site=http://www.red-lang.org \|tags=red,red/system}} Red is a paradigm-neutral [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homoiconicity homoiconic] language, strongly inspired by [~~tag:rebol~~[Rebol]]. Like Rebol, Red has a low memory footprint, is garbage collected, and has a [http://www.red-lang.org/p/download.html low disk footprint (< 1MB)]. But while Rebol is an interpreted language written in ANSI-C, Red seeks to be a "full-stack" language whose methodology is independent of any other toolchain. It compiles that which can be known ahead of time, JIT-compiles that which cannot, and embeds a small interpreter into its executables to handle constructions which are not amenable to any compilation. AsRed anembeds ~~intermediate~~several ~~language~~DSLs, among which Red/System (~~IL)~~C semantics meet Red ~~uses~~syntax), adedicated Cto low-~~like~~level ~~language~~and ~~called~~system ~~Red/System~~programming. ~~Red/System's parser~~It is ~~reused~~also ~~from~~used ~~Red~~as ~~itself...and~~an ~~for~~intermediate ~~which~~language it(IL) ~~has~~when ~~its~~Red ~~own~~is ~~code generators~~compiled. The Red executable is able to build Red/System files directly (`.reds`) as well as Red files (`.red`), and Red/System code may be embedded freely in Red code. ==Useful links== * [http://www.red-lang.org Red Language Website] * [https://twitter.com/red_lang @red_lang] on Twitter. * [https://gitter.im/red/red Red community chat] on Gitter. * [https://www.reddit.com/r/redlang/new/ Forum] on reddit * [http://groups.google.com/group/red-lang?hl=en Mailing-List]