Village Pump/De-skilling?: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(New discussion topic)
 
m (Add missing signature)
Line 4: Line 4:


Maybe RC will spur lecturers to create even better examples for their students.
Maybe RC will spur lecturers to create even better examples for their students.
<div><small>''(This was written by [[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User_talk:Paddy3118|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Paddy3118|contribs]]) at 26 February 2011, 08:20 UTC)''</small></div>

Revision as of 10:07, 28 February 2011

I came across this cartoon in which an initially enthusiastic programmer laments the amount of boilerplate cruft they have to write; finally finds an interesting problem; roughs-out analgorithm; then googles for other solutions only to become depressed on finding good or better algorithms pre-written in every language. They end up even more depressed.

I immediately thought that RC has a lot of examples in many languages so could be the source of such despair; but really think the mindset of the person is wrong. Why be depressed about not being able to contribute an original algorithm. Algorithms and their implementations are better off being honed and copied.

Maybe RC will spur lecturers to create even better examples for their students.

(This was written by Paddy3118 (Talk | contribs) at 26 February 2011, 08:20 UTC)