User talk:WillNess: Difference between revisions
→Space complexity improvement -- Hamming numbers
GordonBGood (talk | contribs) (→Space complexity improvement -- Hamming numbers: reasons 64-bit code is so much faster...) |
|||
Line 64:
:: Yes, of course parallelization of the outer loop is easily possible and would speed the code up by a constant factor, but is probably a little much for a RosettaCode posting. --[[User:GordonBGood|GordonBGood]] ([[User talk:GordonBGood|talk]]) 01:20, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
::: Interesting stuff, thanks. Of course I always expect the more abstract source code to be compiled into as efficient low-level code as possible; that was The High Premise of Equational Reasoning as I understood it. All this toiling with the minutiae of coding is off-putting for me. I'd rather prefer <code>(sum *** concat) . unzip $ [.....]</code> instead. :) :) -- [[User:WillNess|WillNess]] ([[User talk:WillNess|talk]]) 09:03, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
| |||