User talk:Ttmrichter: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Welcome == |
== Welcome == |
||
: Welcome to RC. I saw your comment on ''idiomatic'' SNOBOL4 usage, and as an old SNOBOL hack had a chuckle and thought I'd say hello. Also, you may want to investigate [[Unicon]] and Icon which are less idiomatic grandchildren of SNOBOL. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 16:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC) |
: Welcome to RC. I saw your comment on ''idiomatic'' SNOBOL4 usage, and as an old SNOBOL hack had a chuckle and thought I'd say hello. Also, you may want to investigate [[Unicon]] and Icon which are less idiomatic grandchildren of SNOBOL. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 16:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
:: Why thank you, Dgamey. I tinkered with SNOBOL4 myself a looooooong time ago, so my thought processes vis a vis the SNOBOL4 way to go are very, very rusty. I am re-familiarising myself with the language again (for obscure reasons which I'll announce in my user info once it's ready to go) and thought writing up a few tasks here could help in the process. |
:: Why thank you, Dgamey. I tinkered with SNOBOL4 myself a looooooong time ago, so my thought processes vis a vis the SNOBOL4 way to go are very, very rusty. I am re-familiarising myself with the language again (for obscure reasons which I'll announce in my user info once it's ready to go) and thought writing up a few tasks here could help in the process. |
||
:: I am vaguely familiar with Icon (I have the books and have written a couple of small programs to get the feel) and have heard of Unicon. I still have a soft spot in my head (sic) for SNOBOL4, though, for just being such a wonky, wonderful language. --[[User:Ttmrichter|Michael T. Richter]] 13:05, 16 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== CHR = Constraint Handling Rules? == |
|||
Should [[:Category:Constraint Handling Rules]] be merged into [[:Category:CHR]]? |
|||
<br />--[[User:GarveyPatrickD|GarveyPatrickD]] ([[User talk:GarveyPatrickD|talk]]) 21:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Probably, yes. |
|||
Latest revision as of 05:42, 13 April 2021
Welcome
- Welcome to RC. I saw your comment on idiomatic SNOBOL4 usage, and as an old SNOBOL hack had a chuckle and thought I'd say hello. Also, you may want to investigate Unicon and Icon which are less idiomatic grandchildren of SNOBOL. --Dgamey 16:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
- Why thank you, Dgamey. I tinkered with SNOBOL4 myself a looooooong time ago, so my thought processes vis a vis the SNOBOL4 way to go are very, very rusty. I am re-familiarising myself with the language again (for obscure reasons which I'll announce in my user info once it's ready to go) and thought writing up a few tasks here could help in the process.
- I am vaguely familiar with Icon (I have the books and have written a couple of small programs to get the feel) and have heard of Unicon. I still have a soft spot in my head (sic) for SNOBOL4, though, for just being such a wonky, wonderful language. --Michael T. Richter 13:05, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
CHR = Constraint Handling Rules?
Should Category:Constraint Handling Rules be merged into Category:CHR?
--GarveyPatrickD (talk) 21:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Probably, yes.