User talk:Tinku99: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(runtime evaluation example: string manipulation) |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 07:19, 2 June 2010 (UTC) |
Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 07:19, 2 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
: I have added a qualification to the example. Could you provide an example of solving the task with "string manipulation" in another language, so I could avoid that aspect of the task ? Thanks. [[User:Tinku99|Tinku99]] 16:24, 2 June 2010 (UTC)tinku99 |
Latest revision as of 16:24, 2 June 2010
Hey! Happy birthday! Or so to speak; I was just noticing your talk page was empty, and was looking at your contrib history--Your first contribution to the site was apparently one year ago today. :) --Michael Mol 19:50, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. I enjoy rosettacode. Tinku99 06:24, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Runtime evaluation/In an environment
Hi, Does Runtime evaluation/In an environment#AutoHotkey comply wth all the restrictions?
They are:
Do so in a way which:
- does not involve string manipulation of the input source code
- is plausibly extensible to a runtime-chosen set of bindings rather than just x
- does not make x a global variable
or note that these are impossible.
I was thinking particularly about the string manipulation.
Thanks. --Paddy3118 07:19, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- I have added a qualification to the example. Could you provide an example of solving the task with "string manipulation" in another language, so I could avoid that aspect of the task ? Thanks. Tinku99 16:24, 2 June 2010 (UTC)tinku99