User talk:MikeMol/Spammer?: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Archiving a section of my talk page.) |
(Undo revision 78617 by Short Circuit (Talk)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Spammer? == |
|||
== Automating infrastructure == |
|||
I suspect (on the basis of what you removed earlier from [[Category talk:Programming Tasks]]) that [[User:Rkcy81]] is a spammer. Fits the pattern. You might want to take action sooner rather than later. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 13:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Concerning [[User_talk:Underscore#Automating infrastructure|what we talked about before]]: I haven't been keeping up with recent changes very well lately, so when you write that village-pump post, please leave me a message on my talk page or send me an email. —[[User:Underscore|Underscore]] ([[User talk:Underscore|Talk]]) 12:46, 17 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
: The username and edit fit the patterns I've seen before, but creating an account requires human intervention, due to the CAPTCHA. It's easy enough to revert all of a user's edits, if necessary. I'm going to hold off for a bit. I've got an idea for how to allow someone with privilege adjustment permissions to force a suspect account to service CAPTCHA requests for each edit, and that might be a better solution in the long run. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 13:57, 16 February 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:18, 1 April 2010
Spammer?
I suspect (on the basis of what you removed earlier from Category talk:Programming Tasks) that User:Rkcy81 is a spammer. Fits the pattern. You might want to take action sooner rather than later. –Donal Fellows 13:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
- The username and edit fit the patterns I've seen before, but creating an account requires human intervention, due to the CAPTCHA. It's easy enough to revert all of a user's edits, if necessary. I'm going to hold off for a bit. I've got an idea for how to allow someone with privilege adjustment permissions to force a suspect account to service CAPTCHA requests for each edit, and that might be a better solution in the long run. --Michael Mol 13:57, 16 February 2010 (UTC)