User talk:Hout: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (// Spring cleaning.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==When is "fully linted" not idiomatic== |
|||
When the user |
|||
# Knows their code is not idiomatic. |
|||
# Knows that their non-idiomatic, rejected style is nevertheless not picked up by an automatic linter. |
|||
You carefully ignore that RC is for idiomatic code and fill RC with code written in a style rejected by the Python community. You leave comments on typing, that are not Python. You remove templates pointing out that your code should be improved. You employ libraries and a methodology Python programmers are not taught - It's Python not Haskell. |
|||
You cry bully when you don't get your way. (Yet again). |
|||
RC shouldn't be turned into a showcase for your many un-idiomatic code samples. Yes we know Python can be written like that, but the community rejected it. |
|||
--[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 09:54, 18 March 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:54, 18 March 2021
When is "fully linted" not idiomatic
When the user
- Knows their code is not idiomatic.
- Knows that their non-idiomatic, rejected style is nevertheless not picked up by an automatic linter.
You carefully ignore that RC is for idiomatic code and fill RC with code written in a style rejected by the Python community. You leave comments on typing, that are not Python. You remove templates pointing out that your code should be improved. You employ libraries and a methodology Python programmers are not taught - It's Python not Haskell.
You cry bully when you don't get your way. (Yet again).
RC shouldn't be turned into a showcase for your many un-idiomatic code samples. Yes we know Python can be written like that, but the community rejected it.