Anonymous user
User talk:Hout: Difference between revisions
→Faulhaber's formula#Python: new section
(→Faulhaber's formula#Python: new section) |
|||
Line 154:
::Hello. This is valid LaTeX. Do I have to infer that LaTeX is broken in RC? If so, I'll remove every equation I have written in the tasks. I'm not going to try to find what is not broken in the LaTeX renderer to fix the formulas: it's not even able to print "\sin x" in the Opera web browser. FYI, the site http://math.stackexchange.com makes heavy use of MathJaX, and everything is printed correctly in every browser I have tested. Same with Wikipedia: everything looks fine.
::[[User:Arbautjc|Arbautjc]] ([[User talk:Arbautjc|talk]]) 16:30, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
== [[Faulhaber's formula#Python]] ==
Thanks to have added the note. I don't know how to change the formulas: they involve double sums with tricky indices, and they would hardly be legible as text only. On the other hand, they are not legible at all as is on many browsers. Not satisfying either way. [[User:Arbautjc|Arbautjc]] ([[User talk:Arbautjc|talk]]) 22:06, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
| |||