Anonymous user
User talk:Dgamey: Difference between revisions
→Jcon - Language or implementation: new section
(→Unimpl_page: new section) |
(→Jcon - Language or implementation: new section) |
||
Line 11:
You might be able to do a conditional text component as "if we're talking about X, add this language-specific text". There may be a way to genericize that, too. I'd poke [[User:Kevin Reid]] and [[User:Mwn3d]]; they're more fluent with parser funcs than I am. [[User:Coderjoe]] or [[User:Ce]] might be able to quickly come up with an inline query for all content with a "notes for unimpl in x" property or some such. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 19:52, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
== Jcon - Language or implementation ==
I've noticed that you didn't like my edit to the Jcon category page. But as I understand it, Jcon is an implementation and not a proper language. If you go to [[Jcon]] you will notice that all the content is still there (just not categorized as a language). And you yourself have included it on [[:Category:Icon_Implementations]]. Additionally the [http://www.cs.arizona.edu/icon/jcon/ Jcon site], the [http://www.cs.arizona.edu/icon/implver.htm Icon site] and also [[wp:Icon_(programming_language)|Wikipedia]] describe Jcon as an implementation instead of a language. So I don't really understand why you insist on listing Jcon as a language on Rosetta Code. --[[User:AndiPersti|Andreas Perstinger]] ([[User talk:AndiPersti|talk]]) 16:27, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
| |||