User talk:Dgamey: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Jcon - Language or implementation: new section) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
I've noticed that you didn't like my edit to the Jcon category page. But as I understand it, Jcon is an implementation and not a proper language. If you go to [[Jcon]] you will notice that all the content is still there (just not categorized as a language). And you yourself have included it on [[:Category:Icon_Implementations]]. Additionally the [http://www.cs.arizona.edu/icon/jcon/ Jcon site], the [http://www.cs.arizona.edu/icon/implver.htm Icon site] and also [[wp:Icon_(programming_language)|Wikipedia]] describe Jcon as an implementation instead of a language. So I don't really understand why you insist on listing Jcon as a language on Rosetta Code. --[[User:AndiPersti|Andreas Perstinger]] ([[User talk:AndiPersti|talk]]) 16:27, 16 March 2014 (UTC) |
I've noticed that you didn't like my edit to the Jcon category page. But as I understand it, Jcon is an implementation and not a proper language. If you go to [[Jcon]] you will notice that all the content is still there (just not categorized as a language). And you yourself have included it on [[:Category:Icon_Implementations]]. Additionally the [http://www.cs.arizona.edu/icon/jcon/ Jcon site], the [http://www.cs.arizona.edu/icon/implver.htm Icon site] and also [[wp:Icon_(programming_language)|Wikipedia]] describe Jcon as an implementation instead of a language. So I don't really understand why you insist on listing Jcon as a language on Rosetta Code. --[[User:AndiPersti|Andreas Perstinger]] ([[User talk:AndiPersti|talk]]) 16:27, 16 March 2014 (UTC) |
||
: I'd be happier if it was an alias rather than blanked out which is what it looked like this morning. It didn't look like the information was all there. |
|||