User talk:Dgamey: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

User talk:Dgamey (view source)

Revision as of 17:48, 1 July 2021

1,247 bytes added , 2 years ago

m

→‎Clipper / Harbour / XBase =: Removed orphan "=" in section title

GarveyPatrickD

1,606

edits

Revision as of 18:48, 17 March 2014 (view source) rosettacode>Dgamey (→‎Jcon - Language or implementation) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 17:48, 1 July 2021 (view source) GarveyPatrickD (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Clipper / Harbour / XBase =: Removed orphan "=" in section title)
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 22: : Hmmm ... this seems to different than I recall. Consistency is better. Go for it. --[[User:Dgamey\|Dgamey]] ([[User talk:Dgamey\|talk]]) 18:48, 17 March 2014 (UTC) ::Sorry for the delay, but I somehow missed your agreement for the changes. --[[User:AndiPersti\|Andreas Perstinger]] ([[User talk:AndiPersti\|talk]]) 19:02, 27 May 2014 (UTC) == Clipper / Harbour / XBase == ::Do you have any objection to Clipper and Harbour being stored under an XBase heading in task solutions? It would seem to me better than duplicating code under separate Clipper and Harbour headings.[[User:Axtens\|Axtens]] ([[User talk:Axtens\|talk]]) 12:59, 8 June 2014 (UTC) == MS SQL v. Transact-SQL == You're one of only two self-proclaimed Users of MS SQL on Rosetta Code. I don't use MS SQL, but I'm trying to understand Rosetta Code's structure. <br /> <br /> [[MSSQL]] redirects to [[:Category:Transact-SQL]]. Both have "/Omit", "examples needing attention", "Implementations", and "User" pages in the Category: namespace. I'm trying to determine if all the MSSQL pages should be redirected to the equivalent Transact-SQL pages. <br /> <br /> Can you help me understand the programmatic relationship of MS SQL and Transact-SQL? For example, does it make more sense to say the Rosetta Code Tasks are encoded in Transact-SQL? <br />--[[User:GarveyPatrickD\|GarveyPatrickD]] ([[User talk:GarveyPatrickD\|talk]]) 17:47, 1 July 2021 (UTC)