User talk:Davbol: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(added reply)
m (→‎Ulam spiral (for primes): added a comment.)
Line 11: Line 11:


: {{reply to|Gerard Schildberger}}{{ping|Gerard Schildberger}} Happy to oblige. Many tasks seemingly attempt to minimize the output section (to barely a "proof-of-concept" exhibit) and having glanced at the other submissions I just sort of assumed that was the case here too, but it looks much better with larger output. :) --[[User:Davbol|Davbol]] ([[User talk:Davbol|talk]]) 14:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
: {{reply to|Gerard Schildberger}}{{ping|Gerard Schildberger}} Happy to oblige. Many tasks seemingly attempt to minimize the output section (to barely a "proof-of-concept" exhibit) and having glanced at the other submissions I just sort of assumed that was the case here too, but it looks much better with larger output. :) --[[User:Davbol|Davbol]] ([[User talk:Davbol|talk]]) 14:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

:: Thanks for your time and understanding.     -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 14:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:33, 7 July 2020

Ulam spiral (for primes)

The task requirement for the Rosetta Code task   Ulam spiral (for primes)   was to choose a grid size that would fill up your terminal screen.

Could you increase the last   (Lau)   output to at least,   for instance,   to maybe fill up at least a screen size of 80×80, or even bigger?

I realize that there are other computer programming language entries that didn't comply with a full-screen version,   and I hesitate of causing a ruckus with a whole bunch of users,   but I thought I would prompt you   (off-task, so to speak)   and see if I could persuade you a bit to enlarge your Ulam spiral ASCII plot.


Thanks.       -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 22:14, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Template:Reply toTemplate:Ping Happy to oblige. Many tasks seemingly attempt to minimize the output section (to barely a "proof-of-concept" exhibit) and having glanced at the other submissions I just sort of assumed that was the case here too, but it looks much better with larger output. :) --Davbol (talk) 14:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your time and understanding.     -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 14:32, 7 July 2020 (UTC)