User talk:Danaj

From Rosetta Code

Wrong value for π[edit]

Oh the ignominy! Even 22/7 would have been more accurate... Thanks for catching this.

No worries, and it really has no impact on the output. I was just stumped for a second about the magic value. It should probably be done with a 'use constant PI => 3.141593;' at the top. Danaj (talk) 17:28, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Prime conspiracy[edit]

I am possibly confused about your statement "using an array rather than a hash to store transitions". Is this what you had in mind? Prime_conspiracy.pl I benchmarked, and didn't see a difference. But if you have a faster version, definitely put it on RC... --SqrtNegInf (talk) 15:07, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

I commented on the gist. Would you recommend replacing the code or adding it as an alternative?
Danaj (talk) 18:00, 29 October 2018 (UTC)