User talk:Cloudius

Removing Kotin syntax highlighting?

Hi, just wondering if you realized the implications of changing the <lang *> tags for the Kotlin entries. The <lang> tag only controls which syntax highlighting configuration is used. It doesn't matter which one is used, but if there isn't one specifically set up for some particular language, a configuration for a similar language can be substituted. There isn't a configuration file for Kotlin, and some experimentation showed that the Scala configuration is a pretty close match, so that highlighting scheme has been used. The main effect of changing <lang scala> to <lang kotlin> in the Kotlin entries is that Kotlin no longer has syntax highlighting. --Thundergnat (talk) 13:42, 3 June 2018

Scala entry was NOT erased.

The Scala entry was NOT erased. I rolled back the edit to a previous version due to all of the unnecessary and seemingly random changes you made throughout the page to the task description and other entries. I hoped that you would realize your error and simply update the Scala entry. Apparently not. I have rolled back the other edits again but kept your Scala updates. --Thundergnat (talk) 19:20, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

I also don't appreciate your unnecessary and seemingly random changes made throughout Rosetta Code tasks and the task decription and other entries, especially under the guise of "adding a Scala entry".   If you going to   add   an entry, don't make a mass (or even a few) of other changes to seeming random language entries (or the task's preamble) without stating what was being done (or accomplished), and hopefully, you would would include the reasons for making the changes.   Edit-wars such as this   (just undoing someone else's undoing of your useless or damaging changes)   shouldn't be allowed here on Rosetta Code, but perhaps a Rosetta Code admininstrator(s) could step in and voice their concerns of your type of behavior.   I've reverted many of your useless changes (regarding the Rosetta Code task Chebyshev coefficients), and you just undid my undoing (and in another case, you twice undid my undoing of my restoration of your useless or damaging changes), and almost always, without comment or a summary.   Now, after your last undoing of my restoration, you have become childish and starting with snide remarks and name-calling.   There is no need for being spiteful, ill tempered, or ill behaved such as you are demonstrating.   If you want to discuss such boorish behavior, leaving such comments in a (change) summary is not the place for being snippy, insulting, or demeaning.   Your unfortunate ill-tempered remarks cannot be elided.   These unnecessary and random changes are just wasting everybody else's time and effort (in undoing your updates and/or damage), and also you are (unfortunately) demonstrating to the world what Rosetta Code is   NOT   about.   You are also demonstrating behaviour very similar to another bygone user who wasted a lot of everyone's precious time.   -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 22:05, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Destructive edits, poor attitude.

I am getting tired of your destructive edits bordering on vandalism. If examples can be improved, fine, improve them, but disparaging remarks help no-one and just make you look like a jerk. You've already been perma-banned as Siskus for similar behaviour. Continue your present course and your Cloudius account will also start accumulating bans. --Thundergnat (talk) 19:57, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

For future reference, any massive unnecessary edits you make to an entire page while adding a task will be summarily reverted. If you continue to do so, you will get a suspension. You have been notified.--Thundergnat (talk) 20:07, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

I am protesting, I have n't deleted no content whatsoever. I think you are overreacting. I notice that RosettaCode has a bad presentation on Apple IPhones and others. What could be done about it? I don't cope our remark about Sisjus. Sincerely yours,--Cloudius (talk) 20:35, 22 July 2018 (UTC)