User talk:CalmoSoft: Difference between revisions
→Poorly named, poorly specced, poorly formatted trivial variations of existing tasks: feeling like Feziwig.
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (→Poorly named, poorly specced, poorly formatted trivial variations of existing tasks: feeling like Feziwig.) |
|||
Line 240:
<br>
What are you about it?--[[User:CalmoSoft|CalmoSoft]] ([[User talk:CalmoSoft|talk]]) 12:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
<blockquote>'''''Quote:'''''<br>
The next twoo task are also appear elsewhere too (LeetCode...):
'''Greatest common divisor'''
<br>
'''Least common multiple'''</blockquote>
: The point is not that a variation of a task may exist somewhere else. Those two are basic, named operations that are useful in many ways. It is no surprise that similarly named tasks exist... but they are differently worded, independently developed and have very little in common other than they are both implementing the same operation. That is entirely different from wholesale plagiarizing of exact wording of copyrighted material.
: The point is that the "tasks" that you have been adding lately are quote "incomprehensibly named, extremely vaguely specced, a trivial variation of some other task or (most likely) some combination..."
<blockquote>'''''Quote:'''''<br>
What are you about it?</blockquote>
: I have no idea what that means. That sentence no verb. Apparently it isn't only your tasks that are incomprehensible and vague. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 23:22, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
| |||