Talk:Unprimeable numbers: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(added comments.) |
(changed bold-face to section headers.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''First 25 or 35?''' |
== '''First 25 or 35?''' == |
||
Gerard, I notice that the task asks for the first 25 unprimeable numbers but Thundergnat and yourself have produced the first 35. I've assumed the latter is correct. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 18:30, 1 December 2019 (UTC) |
Gerard, I notice that the task asks for the first 25 unprimeable numbers but Thundergnat and yourself have produced the first 35. I've assumed the latter is correct. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 18:30, 1 December 2019 (UTC) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: Yes, I will change it ASAP. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 18:55, 1 December 2019 (UTC) |
: Yes, I will change it ASAP. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 18:55, 1 December 2019 (UTC) |
||
''off-by-one or output limited in REXX?'' |
== ''off-by-one or output limited in REXX?'' == |
||
The REXX output example only shows the 34 first unprimes compared. Ends with 848 instead of the 890 the other examples output. [[User:Zino|Zino]] ([[User talk:Zino|talk]]) 03:34, 2 January 2020 (UTC) |
The REXX output example only shows the 34 first unprimes compared. Ends with 848 instead of the 890 the other examples output. [[User:Zino|Zino]] ([[User talk:Zino|talk]]) 03:34, 2 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 05:21, 2 January 2020
First 25 or 35?
Gerard, I notice that the task asks for the first 25 unprimeable numbers but Thundergnat and yourself have produced the first 35. I've assumed the latter is correct. --PureFox (talk) 18:30, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, I will change it ASAP. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 18:55, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
off-by-one or output limited in REXX?
The REXX output example only shows the 34 first unprimes compared. Ends with 848 instead of the 890 the other examples output. Zino (talk) 03:34, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
- Yuppers, I found the problem in the program, it was an incorrect comparison operator. The program has been fixed, and the output updated. Thanks for finding the omission. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 05:16, 2 January 2020 (UTC)