Talk:Triplet of three numbers: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


: Added a comment to said entry. I'll also note that 6 entries say 46 found, 10 do not.
: Added a comment to said entry. I'll also note that 6 entries say 46 found, 10 do not.
: I suspect there is a prime +4 +6 task knocking about somewhere that is effectively identical to this. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]])
: I suspect there is a prime +4 +6 task knocking about somewhere that is effectively identical to this.
: Ah, obviously: [[Prime_triplets]] and/or [[Cousin_primes]] are ''so'' similar to this they should '''not''' be (a triplet of three) separate tasks. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]])


Also, "of three" is somewhat superfluous after "Triplet".
Also, "of three" is somewhat superfluous after "Triplet".

Revision as of 21:43, 18 May 2021

Clarification please

The task is called "Triplet of three numbers", but the description requires the "numbers n" associated with three numbers. Can this be clarified? All but one of the contributions so far hedge their bets and return both.

Added a comment to said entry. I'll also note that 6 entries say 46 found, 10 do not.
I suspect there is a prime +4 +6 task knocking about somewhere that is effectively identical to this.
Ah, obviously: Prime_triplets and/or Cousin_primes are so similar to this they should not be (a triplet of three) separate tasks. --Pete Lomax (talk)

Also, "of three" is somewhat superfluous after "Triplet".

Wait till you see the triplets of seven numbers task, now that promises to be difficult... --Pete Lomax (talk) 21:33, 18 May 2021 (UTC)