Talk:Three word location: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Seems like a rather pointless task)
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Geohash, only useless?==
==Geohash, only useless?==
So it seems this is [[Geohash]] only bespoke, limited precision and unsupported anywhere else? What's the point? --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 16:57, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
So it seems this is [[Geohash]] only bespoke, limited precision and unsupported anywhere else? What's the point? --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 16:57, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

==Whats to do?==
HI, I think the task decription needs fleshing out. It doesn't describe in enough detail what needs to be done. (Remember it needs to not rely on any particular implementation). Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 20:50, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

==Add a scramble?==
If there a way was added to reliably scramble the string array order, there might be a use: to create obscured geohashes.

==Masks for w1 w2 w3==
15 bits is 0x7fff

14 bits is 0x3fff

22 bits is 0x3fffff

--[[User:Raslbg|Raslbg]] ([[User talk:Raslbg|talk]]) 17:53, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:27, 21 July 2020

Geohash, only useless?

So it seems this is Geohash only bespoke, limited precision and unsupported anywhere else? What's the point? --Thundergnat (talk) 16:57, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Whats to do?

HI, I think the task decription needs fleshing out. It doesn't describe in enough detail what needs to be done. (Remember it needs to not rely on any particular implementation). Thanks. --Paddy3118 (talk) 20:50, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Add a scramble?

If there a way was added to reliably scramble the string array order, there might be a use: to create obscured geohashes.

Masks for w1 w2 w3

15 bits is 0x7fff

14 bits is 0x3fff

22 bits is 0x3fffff

--Raslbg (talk) 17:53, 20 July 2020 (UTC)