Talk:Ternary logic: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (→test case: sign) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] 07:21, 26 August 2011 (UTC) |
[[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] 07:21, 26 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
==Task structure== |
|||
How about adding a truth table for implementation and cutting the history/leaving a link to the history?--[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 08:29, 26 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 08:29, 26 August 2011
test case
re: "Kudos (κῦδος) for actually thinking up a test case algorithm where ternary logic is intrinsically useful, optimises the test case algorithm and is preferable to binary logic".
I know that calculating Perfect numbers and Matrix-exponentiation_operator in binary has some algorithmic advantages. I imagine that there is some problem would benefit from Ternary logic. Any hints or suggestions?
NevilleDNZ 07:21, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Task structure
How about adding a truth table for implementation and cutting the history/leaving a link to the history?--Paddy3118 08:29, 26 August 2011 (UTC)