Anonymous user
Talk:Ternary logic: Difference between revisions
m
→another ternary truth table: added indentations.
m (→another ternary truth table: added indentations.) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 61:
[[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] 09:16, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
: Eh which C code are we talking about? This topic was about using floating point to represent probability (or so I thought), so the natural thing is using range 0 to 1. I don't see how -1 got in here? --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 11:56, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
==another ternary truth table==
I found another ternary truth table that I used for validation of some of the other functions for the REXX example (which shows more functions) at:
::: http://www.scribd.com/doc/78370674/31/A-6-2-AND-XOR-OR-XNOR-NAND
:::::: ''Ternary Computing Testbed 3-Trit Computer Architecture'' by Jeff Connelly
:::::: Computer Engineering Department August 29<sup>th</sup>, 2008
:::::: which is on page 59: A.6.2. AND, XOR, OR, XNOR, NAND
:::::::::::::::::::: -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 06:48, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
|