Talk:Ternary logic: Difference between revisions

m
m (→‎another ternary truth table: added indentations.)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 61:
 
[[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] 09:16, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
: Eh which C code are we talking about? This topic was about using floating point to represent probability (or so I thought), so the natural thing is using range 0 to 1. I don't see how -1 got in here? --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 11:56, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
 
==another ternary truth table==
 
I found another ternary truth table that I used for validation of some of the other functions for the REXX example (which shows more functions) at:
::: http://www.scribd.com/doc/78370674/31/A-6-2-AND-XOR-OR-XNOR-NAND
:::::: ''Ternary Computing Testbed 3-Trit Computer Architecture''   by   Jeff Connelly
:::::: Computer Engineering Department &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; August 29<sup>th</sup>, 2008
:::::: which is on page 59: &nbsp; &nbsp; A.6.2. &nbsp; &nbsp; AND, XOR, OR, XNOR, NAND
:::::::::::::::::::: -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 06:48, 3 March 2013 (UTC)