Talk:Synchronous concurrency: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 21:09, 21 October 2007

Strange requirement

This aricle currently contains the following text: "This task should not be implemented using fork, spawn, or the linux/unix/Win32 pipe command." I think this is a very strange requirement for a task where "The goal of this task is to create two concurrent activities that share data synchronously". I think that goal actually describes one of the most common uses of fork(), spawn(), pipes and similar constructs. I suggest we remove this requirement. Ahy1 12:43, 21 October 2007 (MDT)

I believe the task was intended to demonstrate coordinated action between two independent processes. Waldorf originally wrote the task; Perhaps he could chime in? --Short Circuit 13:17, 21 October 2007 (MDT)

I was looking specifically for concurrent tasks within a single program. Many languages call these concurrent units threads. Ada calls them tasks. There are other approaches and names for such capabilities. What I did not want was program-to-program communication as is common using fork, spawn, and pipe. Some languages, such as Java, Ada, and ML, have concurrent features built in. Some languages, such as C and C++, use external libraries to achieve similar ends. Some languages have no concurrency capabilities. I would not expect examples from languages with no capabilities. Waldorf 15:08, 21 October 2007 (MDT)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 I suggest we remove this requirement. [[User:Ahy1|Ahy1]] 12:43, 21 October 2007 (MDT)
 :I believe the task was intended to demonstrate coordinated action between two independent processes.  Waldorf originally wrote the task; Perhaps he could chime in? --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 13:17, 21 October 2007 (MDT)
+:I was looking specifically for concurrent tasks within a single program. Many languages call these concurrent units threads. Ada calls them tasks. There are other approaches and names for such capabilities. What I did ''not'' want was program-to-program communication as is common using fork, spawn, and pipe. Some languages, such as Java, Ada, and ML, have concurrent features built in. Some languages, such as C and C++, use external libraries to achieve similar ends. Some languages have no concurrency capabilities. I would not expect examples from languages with no capabilities. [[User:Waldorf|Waldorf]] 15:08, 21 October 2007 (MDT)