Talk:Sum and product puzzle: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→Scala: new section) |
(→Scala) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
val step3 = step2 filter { prodEq(_).intersect(step2).size == 1 } |
val step3 = step2 filter { prodEq(_).intersect(step2).size == 1 } |
||
: step2 filters the step0 integer pairs for pairs where "For every possible sum decomposition of the number X+Y, the product has in turn more than one product decomposition" |
|||
: step3 filters the set defined by step2 for pairs where "The number X*Y has only one product decomposition for which fact 1 is true" |
|||
: Perhaps the Haskell or JavaScript versions might seem more legible ? [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 17:35, 21 October 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:35, 21 October 2016
Remove draft status?
Now that I improved the task description, is this task ready for prime time? --Smls (talk) 14:47, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Scala
Could someone in the know please explain these two lines in plain English?
val step2 = step0 filter { sumEq(_) forall { prodEq(_).size != 1 }}
step2 contains the pairs whose product is unique and ??
val step3 = step2 filter { prodEq(_).intersect(step2).size == 1 }
- step2 filters the step0 integer pairs for pairs where "For every possible sum decomposition of the number X+Y, the product has in turn more than one product decomposition"
- step3 filters the set defined by step2 for pairs where "The number X*Y has only one product decomposition for which fact 1 is true"
- Perhaps the Haskell or JavaScript versions might seem more legible ? Hout (talk) 17:35, 21 October 2016 (UTC)