Talk:Subleq: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
(Add comment about promotion.) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
You mention code points and characters as well as giving character numbers. Should you just state that for this example use ASCII? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 00:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC) |
You mention code points and characters as well as giving character numbers. Should you just state that for this example use ASCII? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 00:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC) |
||
: My example uses ASCII; I'll add language to that effect. But there's no reason to limit the implementation to ASCII. One that handled arbitrary Unicode code points would still run it fine. An EBCDIC machine might have a problem with it.. [[User:Markjreed|Markjreed]] ([[User talk:Markjreed|talk]]) 00:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC) |
: My example uses ASCII; I'll add language to that effect. But there's no reason to limit the implementation to ASCII. One that handled arbitrary Unicode code points would still run it fine. An EBCDIC machine might have a problem with it.. [[User:Markjreed|Markjreed]] ([[User talk:Markjreed|talk]]) 00:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC) |
||
==Promoting== |
|||
Haven't seen any other complaints about the task, and we've got several implementations added, so I've promoted it out of draft status. [[User:Markjreed|Markjreed]] ([[User talk:Markjreed|talk]]) 17:51, 29 April 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:51, 29 April 2015
Just want to get some eyes on this and maybe a couple more implementations before releasing it.. Markjreed (talk) 01:34, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Code points?
You mention code points and characters as well as giving character numbers. Should you just state that for this example use ASCII? --Paddy3118 (talk) 00:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- My example uses ASCII; I'll add language to that effect. But there's no reason to limit the implementation to ASCII. One that handled arbitrary Unicode code points would still run it fine. An EBCDIC machine might have a problem with it.. Markjreed (talk) 00:55, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Promoting
Haven't seen any other complaints about the task, and we've got several implementations added, so I've promoted it out of draft status. Markjreed (talk) 17:51, 29 April 2015 (UTC)