Talk:String interpolation (included): Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: It isn't going to get any better. Another (less widespread) problem is documentation. Fixing it, will just have to look ugly for a while with all the attention tags. The problem is the Wikipedia article shows printf for variable interpolation which is referenced. Choices: |
:: It isn't going to get any better. Another (less widespread) problem is documentation. Fixing it, will just have to look ugly for a while with all the attention tags. The problem is the Wikipedia article shows printf for variable interpolation which is referenced. Choices: |
||
::* Let it ride (and maybe make it clear it's okay) |
::* Let it ride (and maybe make it clear it's okay) |
||
::* Clarify and flag |
::* Clarify and make keeping the result in a string a requirement. Then flag. |
||
::* Clarify and make it optional to show that the interpolated string can be retained in the program for further manipulation |
::* Clarify and make it optional to show that the interpolated string can be retained in the program for further manipulation. Then (optional or different) flag? Or not? |
||
:: Thoughts? |
:: Thoughts? |
||
--[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 11:26, 1 June 2010 (UTC) |
--[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 11:26, 1 June 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:50, 1 June 2010
Task clarification
I would think the intent would be to show that strings can be manipulated within the language. At least one example shows what appears to be print formatting only. I would think that that wouldn't meet the intent. So a printf would not pass but an sprintf would.
- Yes, but, has it gone too far to correct? --Paddy3118 07:03, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
- It isn't going to get any better. Another (less widespread) problem is documentation. Fixing it, will just have to look ugly for a while with all the attention tags. The problem is the Wikipedia article shows printf for variable interpolation which is referenced. Choices:
- Let it ride (and maybe make it clear it's okay)
- Clarify and make keeping the result in a string a requirement. Then flag.
- Clarify and make it optional to show that the interpolated string can be retained in the program for further manipulation. Then (optional or different) flag? Or not?
- Thoughts?
- It isn't going to get any better. Another (less widespread) problem is documentation. Fixing it, will just have to look ugly for a while with all the attention tags. The problem is the Wikipedia article shows printf for variable interpolation which is referenced. Choices:
--Dgamey 11:26, 1 June 2010 (UTC)