Talk:Strange unique prime triplets: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 13:27, 10 March 2021

uniqueness of the prime numbers being added

How about: 3 + 3 + 11

Nothing was mentioned about n, m, and p being unique or not. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 11:05, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Added the uniqueness. I would like to rename it "strange unique prime triplets" or some such? --Paddy3118 (talk) 11:33, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

other definitions of strange primes

Note that there are other definitions of strange primes.

One possibility is to rename this Rosetta Code task to: three primes summing to a prime or
three unique primes summing to a prime, or somesuch.

Mathoverflow has different definition at:

strange and non strange prime numbers are there infinitely many of them. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 11:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

added a stretch goal

I added a stretch goal of finding all the three unique primes summing to a prime, with the primes < 1,000.

I tried 10,000, but that seemed to be pushing it a bit too far. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 13:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 &nbsp; [https://mathoverflow.net/questions/363703/strange-and-non-strange-prime-numbers-are-there-infinitely-many-of-them strange and non strange prime numbers are there infinitely many of them]. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;  -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 11:28, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
+== added a stretch goal ==
+I added a stretch goal of finding all the three unique primes summing to a prime, with the primes &nbsp; &lt; &nbsp; '''1,000.'''
+I tried &nbsp; '''10,000,''' &nbsp; but that seemed to be pushing it a bit too far. &nbsp; &nbsp; -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 13:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)