Anonymous user
Talk:Stern-Brocot sequence: Difference between revisions
→Python using "generic and reusable functional abstractions"
(→deque over list?: don't matter none if you don't pop()) |
|||
Line 114:
# print [find(x, stern_brocot1()) for x in range(1, 1000)]</lang>
: In my tests, for larger numbers, using <code>find</code> along with <code>stern_brocot4()</code> is noticeably faster than other combinations. --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] ([[User talk:Ledrug|talk]]) 19:39, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
==Python using "generic and reusable functional abstractions"==
The answers style seems to be for some ulterior motive as Python functions such as `all` are not used and the Python type annotations are not given. It reads as if the author has written another languages functions in Python then converted another languages solution using it rather than using a more Pythonic solution from the standard Python libraries and built-ins; (and type annotations).
I wonder where the style originates? (Or if a comment on its derivation needs to be attached). [[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 13:30, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
| |||