Talk:Stack traces: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→About Smalltalk: new section) |
m (→About Smalltalk: finer answer) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
What's wrong with Smalltalk? It mimics the behaviour of the others (for what it is possible). --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 20:46, 14 June 2009 (UTC) |
What's wrong with Smalltalk? It mimics the behaviour of the others (for what it is possible). --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 20:46, 14 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
: I.e.: what was added that triggered the template "may be incorrect"? According to me it meets all the requirement... --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 20:48, 14 June 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:48, 14 June 2009
More info?
How about changing the task to print a stack trace from within g() which is called from f() - and actually show sample output for inter-language ccomparison? --Paddy3118 18:13, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- I don't particularly want to constrain what people call the functions as precise comparisons aren't the point of the task (the point: show facilities for debugging without having to use an external debugger) but showing what the output is is a very good idea. —Donal Fellows 07:52, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
About Smalltalk
What's wrong with Smalltalk? It mimics the behaviour of the others (for what it is possible). --ShinTakezou 20:46, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- I.e.: what was added that triggered the template "may be incorrect"? According to me it meets all the requirement... --ShinTakezou 20:48, 14 June 2009 (UTC)