Talk:Square-free integers: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "== 1000000145 isn't square-free == Am I missing something here? 1000000145 = 5 * 59 * 911 * 61^2 That looks very unsquare-free to me. Why is it that all of the solutions se...")
 
Line 5: Line 5:
1000000145 = 5 * 59 * 911 * 61^2
1000000145 = 5 * 59 * 911 * 61^2


That looks very unsquare-free to me. Why is it that all of the solutions seem to have it included in the list of square-free numbers? The racket solution has unit tests to labour the point that this is wrong.
That looks very unsquare-free to me. Why is it that all of the solutions seem to have it included in the list of square-free numbers? The racket solution has unit tests to labour the point that this is wrong. --[[User:Tim-brown|Tim-brown]] ([[User talk:Tim-brown|talk]]) 18:46, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:46, 6 January 2019

1000000145 isn't square-free

Am I missing something here?

1000000145 = 5 * 59 * 911 * 61^2

That looks very unsquare-free to me. Why is it that all of the solutions seem to have it included in the list of square-free numbers? The racket solution has unit tests to labour the point that this is wrong. --Tim-brown (talk) 18:46, 6 January 2019 (UTC)