Anonymous user
Talk:Short-circuit evaluation: Difference between revisions
→Why a draft task?: Not any more.
(→Why a draft task?: Not any more.) |
|||
Line 2:
A comment in [http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Rosetta_Code:Village_Pump/Request_a_programming_task#Unsorted here] (look for ''shortcutting''), thought that the task would most likely not be written in a neutral manner. I've tried to write a task that allows each language, whether it has short-circuit evaluation or not, to solve the problem idiomatically. <br>
I saw the comments on the Icon solution, for example, which makes me think that the task could soon loose the draft status? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 23:59, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
: I removed the draft status as the examples seem to cope (another example is Pascal where some compilers have it and some do not).
== Error in task? ==
| |||