Talk:Set consolidation: Difference between revisions

Talk:Set consolidation (view source)

476 bytes added , 10 years ago

→‎Haskell: Output is ok

Anonymous user

Revision as of 07:17, 1 July 2012 (view source) rosettacode>Paddy3118 (→‎Sets of Sets: There can be one.) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 17:07, 2 March 2014 (view source) rosettacode>AndiPersti (→‎Haskell: Output is ok)
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 30: :Hi Rdm, think of the intermediate as being consistently a set of set'''s''' where the number of set'''s''' can equal one; or more. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] 07:17, 1 July 2012 (UTC) :: I did :) --[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] 17:17, 1 July 2012 (UTC) == Haskell == Is the Haskell version producing the right output for example 4? --[[User:Soegaard\|Soegaard]] ([[User talk:Soegaard\|talk]]) 18:05, 17 May 2013 (UTC) :Without any output, I cannot tell. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118\|talk]]) 19:14, 17 May 2013 (UTC) :The output looks fine to me. --[[User:AndiPersti\|Andreas Perstinger]] ([[User talk:AndiPersti\|talk]]) 17:07, 2 March 2014 (UTC)