Talk:Sequence of non-squares: Difference between revisions

::Since there are values, and since those values must either be squares or non-squares, then if we show that there are no squares in the sequence, the resulting sequence must consist of non-squares. I don't see an ambiguity with the task description, though perhaps the reasons the existing requirements are sufficient could be more clear. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 20:07, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

:::Heh, ask a rhetorical question, get a supersized answer. A nitpick though, an empty set S is normally considered to sastify the requirement "for every E in S, E is not an A". Kinda how an empty set is considered to have a permutation of 1, come to think of it. --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 20:29, 15 June 2011 (UTC)