Talk:Sanitize user input: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(agree) |
(removal of "task" note) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Delete? Is this task meant to be serious or someone's idea of a mickey-take? The link to Bobby tables takes me to a wiki explaining comics. Clearly this rc contributor's input is not to be trusted--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 13:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC) |
Delete? Is this task meant to be serious or someone's idea of a mickey-take? The link to Bobby tables takes me to a wiki explaining comics. Clearly this rc contributor's input is not to be trusted--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 13:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC) |
||
:Not too fussed. I think it is mildly interesting that sometimes you have to sanitize your own source code in much the same way as user input, but otherwise I agree this is "not a task". Delete or "orphan" by removing the <nowiki>{{draft task}}</nowiki> tag would both be fine by me. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 14:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC) |
:Not too fussed. I think it is mildly interesting that sometimes you have to sanitize your own source code in much the same way as user input, but otherwise I agree this is "not a task". Delete or "orphan" by removing the <nowiki>{{draft task}}</nowiki> tag would both be fine by me. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 14:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC) |
||
:OK, I've gone ahead and removed "task", we'll see what portals to hell open up for me. As I said I'm fine with this being on rc, as a mildly interesting diversion/discussion, but it does not qualify as a task. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 10:31, 11 September 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:32, 11 September 2021
Delete? Is this task meant to be serious or someone's idea of a mickey-take? The link to Bobby tables takes me to a wiki explaining comics. Clearly this rc contributor's input is not to be trusted--Nigel Galloway (talk) 13:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- Not too fussed. I think it is mildly interesting that sometimes you have to sanitize your own source code in much the same way as user input, but otherwise I agree this is "not a task". Delete or "orphan" by removing the {{draft task}} tag would both be fine by me. --Pete Lomax (talk) 14:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
- OK, I've gone ahead and removed "task", we'll see what portals to hell open up for me. As I said I'm fine with this being on rc, as a mildly interesting diversion/discussion, but it does not qualify as a task. --Pete Lomax (talk) 10:31, 11 September 2021 (UTC)