Talk:Same fringe: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 01:28, 19 August 2012 (view source) rosettacode>Spoon! (→‎Copy problem in D entry?) ← Older edit		Revision as of 01:32, 19 August 2012 (view source) rosettacode>Spoon! (→‎Copy problem in D entry?) Newer edit →
Line 66:		Line 66:

	I was just wondering about the 10, 20, 30 and 1, 2, 3? --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] 19:49, 18 August 2012 (UTC)		I was just wondering about the 10, 20, 30 and 1, 2, 3? --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] 19:49, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
	:I believe the author intends ~~n()~~ ~~with~~ 3 ~~things~~ to ~~mean~~ a ~~node~~ ~~with~~ a ~~value~~ and ~~two~~ ~~branches~~, ~~and~~ that the value of ~~the~~ node is not considered when taking the fringe. Or something like that. --[[User:Spoon!\|Spoon!]] 01:28, 19 August 2012 (UTC)		:Judging from the previous Haskell code (which I have replaced), I believe the author intends the first argument of n to be the value of that node, and the following to be children. And if there are no children, then it is a leaf. And that the value of a node that is not a leaf is not considered when taking the fringe. Or something like that. They may be confused because there are different concepts of trees, some with values at nodes and some without; and the problem is not very specific about that. --[[User:Spoon!\|Spoon!]] 01:28, 19 August 2012 (UTC)