Talk:Same fringe: Difference between revisions
m
Thundergnat moved page Talk:Same Fringe to Talk:Same fringe: Follow normal task title capitalization policy
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) m (Thundergnat moved page Talk:Same Fringe to Talk:Same fringe: Follow normal task title capitalization policy) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 67:
I was just wondering about the 10, 20, 30 and 1, 2, 3? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 19:49, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
:Judging from the previous Haskell code (which I have replaced), I believe the author intends the first argument of n to be the value of that node, and the following to be children. And if there are no children, then it is a leaf. And that the value of a node that is not a leaf is not considered when taking the fringe. Or something like that. They may be confused because there are different concepts of trees, some with values at nodes and some without; and the problem is not very specific about that. --[[User:Spoon!|Spoon!]] 01:28, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
==Elevate to task now?==
Any qualms about elevating this from draft status? --[[User:TimToady|TimToady]] 03:29, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
:None hear except I see a separate problem in that the RC server doesn't seem to be colourizing code at the moment so I might wait a little? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 05:02, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
:: Elevated. Whatever the glitch was, it must have been temporary. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 10:16, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
| |||