Talk:Rock-paper-scissors: Difference between revisions
Alternative wording?
(added comment about possible bulky programs. -- ~~~~) |
(Alternative wording?) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
== Ready to come out of draft ==
Ready to come out of draft? --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 15:48, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
:I like it. I haven't seen any questions. I think people understand RPS pretty well. +1 for promotion. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 16:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Line 6 ⟶ 7:
::: Using proper "English" for the winner (''paper disproves Spock, paper covers rock, etc.) while not being problematic, made my program entry a bit ... bulky. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 08:46, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
::: Implementing ''rock-paper-scissors-lizard-Spock'' would expand programs into two directions: more abstraction, or more bulk. Abstraction is good, but harder to read and/or understand. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 08:50, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
== gooder English for winners ==
I've always played this game with the following verbiage:
:::* Rock breaks scissors.
:::* Scissors cuts paper.
:::* Paper covers rock.
-- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 23:07, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
:When I've played it, it was:
:::* Rock blunts scissors.
:::* Scissors cuts paper.
:::* Paper wraps rock.
:--[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 10:19, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
| |||