Talk:Read a configuration file: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
m (→‎"Standard": language specific?)
(→‎"Standard": Agreed.)
Line 23: Line 23:
I would like to see a statement of exactly how this configuration file format is “standard”, or the removal of the “standard” wording. Or, parsing a more “standard” (well-known) config file format such as Java properties or INI. —[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 18:49, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
I would like to see a statement of exactly how this configuration file format is “standard”, or the removal of the “standard” wording. Or, parsing a more “standard” (well-known) config file format such as Java properties or INI. —[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 18:49, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


Agreed. My inclination would be to use INI as being more "language neutral".--[[User:Tikkanz|Tikkanz]] 20:00, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
: Agreed. My inclination would be to use INI as being more "language neutral".--[[User:Tikkanz|Tikkanz]] 20:00, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
: It would probably be better to formulate similar as "read a config file according to your language standard, extra credit for INI, Java property and XYZ" --[[User:Jofur|<Jofur>]] 20:11, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
: It would probably be better to formulate similar as "read a config file according to your language standard, extra credit for INI, Java property and XYZ" --[[User:Jofur|<Jofur>]] 20:11, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
: Agreed as well. I'd also be interested in seeing if there are configuration formats which can be parsed based on run-time-consumable grammar definitions. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 20:23, 16 February 2011 (UTC)