Talk:Primes with digits in nondecreasing order: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(added a talk section (concerning the use of DIGITS was probably meant to be DECIMAL DIGITS).)
 
m (→‎task clarification: changed a word.)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== task clarification ==
== task clarification ==


Perhaps the task should be clarified in that the   ''digits''   mentioned probably should say   '''decimal digits''',   but there is already a solution that uses other bases than decimal.   Otherwise,    -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 16:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Perhaps the task should be clarified in that the   ''digits''   mentioned probably should say   '''decimal digits''',   but there is already a solution that uses other bases than decimal.   Otherwise, I would've changed the task description to just use primes expressed in decimal   (base ten).     -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 16:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:47, 31 March 2021

task clarification

Perhaps the task should be clarified in that the   digits   mentioned probably should say   decimal digits,   but there is already a solution that uses other bases than decimal.   Otherwise, I would've changed the task description to just use primes expressed in decimal   (base ten).     -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 16:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)