Talk:Parse EBNF/Tests

Revision as of 01:51, 9 September 2011 by rosettacode>Kernigh (I guess because it never defines a production for ''bar''.)

Why the example provided at the bottom of the page

{ foo = bar . }

is not a valid EBNF grammar, according to the accepted definition?

I guess because it never defines a production for bar. --Kernigh 01:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Return to "Parse EBNF/Tests" page.